Miller v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Carroll Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The facts, as they appear in the special ver*98diet, are, in substance, these: The track of the appellee crosses a public highway not far from the city of Lafayette. The railroad runs from north to south, and the highway from east to west, but neither runs on a direct line. The track approaches the crossing from the west on a descending grade of about sixty feet to the mile, and the grade of the highway from the south descends to the crossing at about two hundred and fifty feet per mile. On the south side of the railroad, and extending from a point one-half mile west of the crossing to a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Knoxville Ry. & Light Co. v. VangilderTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CreekIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Clarke v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Kokesh v. PriceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.