Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Criminal Court of Marion County (36,256); William Irvin, Special Judge. Prosecution by The State of Indiana against the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment of conviction, defendant appeals. Affirmed. (Appealed to United States Supreme Court, see — U. S. —.)
1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.
The State of Indiana instituted this prosecution by affidavit against appellant for a violation of the provisions of an act of the General Assembly approved February 13, 1907 (Acts 1907, p. 18, §§5295-5298 Burns 1908), known as the “full crew act.” The title of the act is: “An act entitled an act concerning railroads and to better protect the lives of railway employes and the traveling public, and providing penalties for the violation thereof.” Omitting the enacting clause, the statute in question is as follows:‘ Section 1. ' That it shall be unlawful for any railroad company doing business…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- County of Mobile v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Gloucester Ferry Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hall v. DeCuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hennington v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Railroad Commission v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Ellwanger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
- Hardwick Farmers Elevator Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Fortune v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.