Legal Opinion
In re Salo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 27, 2010PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Frederick William Salo was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Third Judicial Department on March 1, 1994. At all times relevant to this proceeding, he has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
In this proceeding, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) seeks respondent’s disbarment or, in the alternative, his suspension from the practice of law for no less than three years. The six charges at issue (two others having been withdrawn) are summarized below.
Charge one alleges that…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- In re AltomerianosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re TepperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re WeingradAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4Cited by8 opinions
- In re SaloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of AfilaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re SquitieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Matter of SpinnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.