Legal Opinion
In re Tepper
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 27, 2001PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent David B. Tepper was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Depart*80ment on March 30, 1977. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law alternately within the First and Second Judicial Departments.
The various charges leading to this disciplinary matter all arise from either respondent’s inadequate bookkeeping in connection with his escrow account, other bookkeeping irregularities, or his commingling of escrow funds without, however, any venal intent or result.…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re SempleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re QuesadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
4Cited by11 opinions
- In re LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re FongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re SaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re DranovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Matter of CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.