Legal Opinion
In re Rosenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 6, 2013PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Neal H. Rosenberg was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on October 22, 1975. At all times relevant to this proceeding, he maintained a principal place of business within the First Judicial Department.
On March 7, 2011, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (Committee) served respondent with a notice and statement of charges containing six charges, four of which alleged professional misconduct stemming from respondent’s misuse of his Attorney Trust Account (trust account).
Charges one and two of the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re AltomerianosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re DyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re SaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
4Cited by11 opinions
- Matter of KimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of NovofastovskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of FortunaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Matter of FortunaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.