Stroemer v. Van Orsdel
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Gage county: Albert H. Babcock, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Albert, C.
We shall use the terms plaintiff and defendant with reference to the title of the cause in the district court.
The plaintiff alleges that he entered into an oral contract with the defendant, whereby he was employed by the defendant as his agent and attorney to take such action and render such services in the way of collecting facts, preparing and submitting to the Indians and the proper authorities of the federal government arguments on the merits of the claims of those holding lands purchased under the act of congress approved March 3, 1881, providing for the sale of the remainder…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Meguire v. CorwineSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Taylor v. BemissSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sedgwick v. . StantonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Noble v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- County of Campbell v. HowardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Chreste v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Hunt v. Okanogan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Gordon v. Gordon's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.