Legal Opinion

Secretary of Labor v. Macy's, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 26, 2024No. 1:17-cv-00541Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI SECRETARY OF LABOR, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 1:17-cv-541 : vs. : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins : MACY’S, INC., et al., : : Defendants. : OPINION & ORDER This is an action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., in which the Secretary of Labor asserts claims relating to the Tobacco Surcharge Wellness Program established in Defendant Macy’s Welfare Benefits Plans. For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES without prejudice to renewal the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  3. Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API