Healey v. Rupp
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Lake County. Hon. Peter L. Palmer, Judge. Action by Albert J. Rupp against John Healey, Michael Gilmore, Patrick Grady and Patrick Cleary. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gabbert
The subject-matter of controversy is the conflict between two lode mining claims, known as the Canestota and Last Batch. The owners of the Last Batch *27applied for patent, which was adversed by the owners of the Canestota. Thereafter suit was brought by appellee, as plaintiff, in support of this adverse against the appellants, as defendants. From a judgment for. plaintiff, the defendants appeal. There have been several trials and the case has been here once before for review: — 28 Colo: 102. Prior to the last trial, the record of which is presented by this appeal, plaintiff, over the objection…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beals v. ConeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
- McGinnis v. EgbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- Erwin v. PeregoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Wolverton v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Wolfley v. Lebanon Mining Co., of New YorkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bowen v. Chemi-Cote Perlite CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Miller v. ScogginWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
- Kline v. SlaterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Warnekros v. CowanArizona Supreme Court · 1910
- Eureka Exploration Co. v. Tom Moore Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.