Warnekros v. Cowan
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District, in and for Cochise County. Fletcher M. Doan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
The appellants, plaintiffs in the court below, filed their complaint, which is sufficient in the facts alleged to free it from attack, considered as a suit to quiet title to the Queen of the Hill mining claim. There, however, appears therein, in substance, the following additional allegations: That the defendant made or attempted to make a mineral location called the Sadie No. 2 lode mining claim, of a part of the said Queen of the Hill mine, and that the said Sadie No. 2 claim conflicts therewith; that the defendant on the twenty-sixth day of October, 1907, made his application for patent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Marquez v. FrisbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Altoona Quicksilver Mining Co. v. Integral Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Catholic Bishop of Nesqually v. GibbonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bowen v. Chemi-Cote Perlite CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Bowen v. Chemi-Cote Perlite CorporationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Smith v. WheelerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1915