United States v. Robert D. Egan
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
This is the direct criminal appeal of Robert D. Egan. Mr. Egan challenges his sentence on the grounds that the district court erred by placing the burden on him of proving that the government acted arbitrarily in refusing to file a substantial assistance motion under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G. or the guidelines) section 5K1.1 and by ruling that he had failed to show that the government acted arbitrarily. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
BACKGROUND
A. Facts
In 1981, Mr. Egan drove Harold Bean and Robert Byron to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. John W. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Charles LezineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Bernard Anthony Durman, David Buffington, Cathy A. Moline, Charles Bradford Moline, Ramon F. Castellanos, and Juan A. CastellanosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Antwand Deshion HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.