Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Brice v. State, Division of Forest, Land & Water Management

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1983No. 7039PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Luther A. Brice, Sam R. Brice, Andy M. Brice, Luther L. Brice, and Helenka M. Brice appeal a judgment of the superior court dismissing their complaint against the State, the Fairbanks North Star Borough, and various private landowners in the Tungsten Subdivision located in the Fairbanks North Star Borough. The Brices had claimed that no highway easement existed across certain property that they own south of the Tungsten Subdivision. We affirm.

The Brices own property that was entered in 1950 and patented in 1952 by Robert S. Johnson. 1 They purchased this property in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Martin v. MearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Girves v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hill v. MoeAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. Alaska Land Title Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Larson v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Dillingham Commercial Co. v. City of DillinghamAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Ahwinona v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Andrews v. Wade & De Young, Inc., P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. McAdoo v. DiazAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API