Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Wade & De Young, Inc., P.C.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1994No. S-5542PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

Everett L. Andrews and Hub City Construction Co., Inc. (collectively referred to as “Hub City”) appeal the superior court’s .dismissal, on res judicata grounds, of their legal malpractice claim against Wade & De Young, Inc.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Wade & De Young’s Action to Recover Its Legal Fees

Wade & De Young provided legal representation for Moneymaker/Hub City, J/V (“Joint Venture”), in the ASHA v. Moneymaker/Hub City, Joint Venture litigation. Following settlement of the ASHA litigation, Hub City declined to authorize any further payments to Wade & De Young…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Wettanen v. CowperAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Jeffries v. Glacier State Telephone Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Martin v. MearsAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Murray v. FeightAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ellingstad v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Sengupta v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Christensen v. NCH Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. McGee v. McGeeAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Allen v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API