Legal Opinion
Woodbridge Realty v. Plymouth Development Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 17, 1955No. Civ. 8482PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
This action was brought by plaintiff and respondent as assignee of licensed real estate brokers to recover a commission from defendants. Judgment was given as prayed for in the complaint and the defendants appeal.
The trial court found as follows: That plaintiff’s assignors were licensed real estate brokers; that on March 9, 1950, Plymouth Development Corporation, which was then the owner of real property near Stockton, executed and delivered to plaintiff’s assignors a document containing the following :
“We hereby issue Woodbridge Realty One Hundred Twenty (120) day authorization to sell in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Twogood v. MonnetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Phelan v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Justy v. ErroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Smith v. SchieleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leonard v. FallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Robison v. FrasierIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Herz v. Clarks MarketCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Turner v. Waldron RealtyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- W. Ross Campbell Co. v. PeskinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.