Marshall N. Dana Construction, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff, Marshall N. Dana Contruction, Inc. (Marshall), seeks reimbursement from the United States of funds it expended constructing public housing. Defendant moves for summary judgment based on lack of jurisdiction under the alleged facts.
Plaintiff was awarded a construction contract by the Warm Springs Housing Authority ( wsha) to build a low income public housing project, wsha was created by the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs to receive federal housing funds as an Indian Housing Authority ( iha), the equivalent of a Public Housing Authority ( pha). This project was to be built with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Housing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- D. R. Smalley & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Berdick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Katz v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Township of Saddle Brook v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Singleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.