Legal Opinion
Central Delta Water Agency v. Bureau of Reclamation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 22, 2006No. 04-16632PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The Opinion filed May 22, 2006 is amended as follows:
1. At page *2 of the Opinion, found at 449 F.3d 965 (9th Cir.2006), in the third full paragraph in the left-hand column, the sentence “The gauging station at Vernalis is located close to the ocean, below the confluence of the two major rivers.” is replaced with:
“The gauging station at Vernalis is located below the confluence of the Stanis-laus River and the San Joaquin River.”
2. At page *2 of 449 F.3d 965, 2006 WL 1377447, in the fourth full paragraph that spans both the left-hand and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cardenas v. AnzaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Central Delta Water Agency v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Magana v. Northern Mariana IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Central Valley Water Agency v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- AquAlliance v. United States Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Central Delta Water Agency v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008