Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Appellants appeal the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). We review de novo the district court’s conclusion that Appellants failed to meet their burden to come forward with sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether they satisfied the injury in fact, causation, and redressability elements of standing. Central Delta Water Agency v. Bureau of Reclamation, 452 F.3d 1021, 1025 (9th Cir.2006). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
“[T]o…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Credit Union Administration v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.