Legal Opinion

San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 2, 2012No. 17-72955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

672 F.3d 676 (2012)

SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY; Westlands Water District, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

Pixley Irrigation District; Lower Tule River Irrigation District; Tri-Valley Water District; Hills Valley Irrigation District; Kern Tulare Water District; Rag Gulch Water District; Stockton East Water District; Fresno County; Tulare County, Plaintiffs-Intervenors, and

Bay Institute of San Francisco; Save San Francisco Bay Association; Environmental Defense Fund; Natural Resources Defense Council; Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations; Institute for Fisheries…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. (HC) Russ v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API