United California Bank v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.
Beneficiaries of the estate of Lucinda Cross filed objections to the final account of United California Bank, executor, *83complaining that the bank had paid commissions to two real estate brokers, without verified claims having been filed and without court approval. The probate court held an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Probate Code section 929 permitted allowance of these expenditures. That statute permits allowance of debts paid to creditors who have not filed claims if “it shall be proven that such debts were justly due, were paid in good faith ...."1…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- County of Alameda v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. NunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Estate of CrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- State v. MollicaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986