Addiction Specialists, Inc. v. The Township of Hampton, the Township of Hampton Council and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAN ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Addiction Specialists, Inc. (“ASI”) brought various constitutional and statutory discrimination claims against the Township of Hampton and Township of Hampton Council (collectively “the Township”). 1 ASI now appeals the September 9, 2004, Order and Opinion of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania granting the Township’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). The District Court relied on the abstention doc trine articulated by the Supreme Court in Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Lazaridis v. WehmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- A HELPING HAND, LLC v. Baltimore County, MDCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Miller Ex Rel. MM v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Harry Hamilton v. Nicole BromleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.