Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Monroe
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Chief Justice.
The complainant, Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board, filed charges against the respondent, William Monroe, alleging he engaged in a sexual relationship with a client in violation of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. After a hearing before a division of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa, the commission found the alleged misconduct had occurred, and this misconduct violated the respondent’s ethical duties as an Iowa lawyer. The commission recommended a thirty-day suspension of the respondent’s license to practice law.
Upon our review of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. DurhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. SteffesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. James W. McgrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. KallsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kenneth F. DolezalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Anthony Zane BlessumSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. Thomas E. LustgraafSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Deborah Lynn JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.