Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kenneth F. Dolezal

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 29, 2011No. 11–0157PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Justice.

This attorney disciplinary proceeding comes before us on the report of a division of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa. See Iowa Ct. R. 35.10(1). The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board alleged the respondent, Kenneth F. Dolezal, violated ethical rules by neglecting three clients’ matters, failing to deposit fees into a client trust account, failing to provide an accounting, failing to communicate with a client, making misrepresentations to a client, and improperly terminating representation of a client.

The commission found Dolezal violated…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. AplandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. HoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. EarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. LickissSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James A. Clarity IIISupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Matthew M. BolesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kenneth F. DolezalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael Hocine SaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Mary Ellen KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API