Legal Opinion

Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. Thomas E. Lustgraaf

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 2010No. 10–0425PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Chief Justice.

This matter comes before us on the report of a division of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa. See Iowa Ct. R. 35.10. The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board alleged the respondent, Thomas E. Lustgraaf, violated ethical rules by failing to file income tax returns for four years. The grievance commission found Lustgraaf violated our ethical rules and recommended a public reprimand. Upon our respectful consideration of the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation of the commission, we find Lustgraaf engaged in ethical…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. LettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. EarleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Vs. Jeffrey M. IrelandSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael J. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Paul J. BieberSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Ronald Lee WheelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Dean A. StowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard R. SchmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API