Legal Opinion

Shillington v. K-Mart Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1991No. 9010SC600PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

With regard to an appeal from a directed verdict, this Court has stated:

A motion by a defendant for a directed verdict under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 50(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, tests the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury and support a verdict for the plaintiff. On such a motion, the plaintiff’s evidence must be taken as true and the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, giving the plaintiff the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. A directed verdict for the defendant is not…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Hogan v. Forsyth Country Club Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ArchibaldCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. Donovan v. FiumaraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Lorbacher v. Housing Authority of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Williams v. Kuppenheimer Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Averitt v. RozierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API