Legal Opinion

Averitt v. Rozier

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1995No. 9412SC608PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, John C., Judge.

Plaintiff contends that genuine issues of material fact exist as to his claim against both defendants, rendering summary judgment inappropriate. We agree there are genuine factual issues with respect to plaintiff’s claim against defendant Rozier and we reverse summary judgment granted in his favor. However, we conclude that no genuine issues of material fact exist as to defendant Johnson and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm sum mary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claim against defendant Johnson.

Summary judgment is appropriate…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Donovan v. FiumaraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Morrow v. Kings Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Phillips v. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Shuping v. BarberCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Barker v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Ausley v. BishopCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Dobson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Moss Creek Homeowners Ass'n v. BissetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API