Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1948No. 31302PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

Stated in its simplest terms, the sole question now before this court for decision is: Did the commission have the jurisdiction and authority, in the situation confronting it, to promulgate an emergency order establishing interim gas rates x pending disposition of the appeals by the company from the rates prescribed by the ordinances referred to above?

Section 614-32, General Code, under which the commission acted, is in the following language:

"The commission shall have power, when deemed by it necessary to prevent injury to the business or interests of the public or any public utility of this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Duff v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of Amherst v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City of Amherst v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. City of Cambridge v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API