City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
Stated in its simplest terms, the sole question now before this court for decision is: Did the commission have the jurisdiction and authority, in the situation confronting it, to promulgate an emergency order establishing interim gas rates x pending disposition of the appeals by the company from the rates prescribed by the ordinances referred to above?
Section 614-32, General Code, under which the commission acted, is in the following language:
"The commission shall have power, when deemed by it necessary to prevent injury to the business or interests of the public or any public utility of this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Akron v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
- City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Cincinnati v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Duff v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Amherst v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Amherst v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Cambridge v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.