J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of Dayton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, J.
Plaintiff brought this action under the Oregon Tort Claims Act to recover damages which allegedly resulted from the city’s approval of a subdivision application submitted by plaintiff’s predecessor in interest. After the subdivision was approved, building permits were issued and construction was commenced. Subsequently, the Circuit Court issued a writ of mandamus ordering the city to vacate the approval of the subdivision and cancel the building permits on the ground that the city had not complied with the provisions of ORS chapter 92, requiring, inter alia, that the city adopt standards and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Bienz v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- J. Gregcin, Inc. v. City of DaytonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Hutcheson v. City of KeizerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Dykeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Indian Creek Development Co. v. City of Hood RiverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Disney-Marine Co., Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.