Legal Opinion

Indian Creek Development Co. v. City of Hood River

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 14, 2005No. 010006 CC; A123521PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

This case arises out of plaintiffs efforts to sell real property in the City of Hood River. Plaintiff brought multiple claims against the city, including a takings claim, an equal protection claim, an intentional interference with prospective business relations claim, and a negligence claim. The jury returned a verdict for defendant on every claim except for the negligence claim, on which it awarded plaintiff $385,000 on the theory that defendant’s negligence caused plaintiff to be unable to sell its property. Defendant appeals, and we reverse.

Defendant raises multiple assignments of error.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. SunigaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Wild Rose Ranch Enterprises, LLC v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Farnworth v. RossettoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Loosli v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Loosli v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API