Legal Opinion

Samuel v. Barnhart

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 29, 2004No. 02-C-0569PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES

ADELMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Steven Samuel brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) challenging the decision of defendant Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, denying his application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. I reversed the Commissioner’s decision, Samuel v. Barnhart, 295 F.Supp.2d 926 (E.D.Wis.2003), and plaintiff now moves for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412.

I. EAJA STANDARD

The EAJA mandates…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Donna J. Clifford v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  5. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lane-Rauth v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Lechner v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
  3. Lechner v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
  4. Cobb v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Wirth v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API