Legal Opinion
Wirth v. Barnhart
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 16, 2004No. 02-C-1249PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEY’S FEES
ADELMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Audrey Wirth brought this 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) action challenging the decision of defendant Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, denying her application for disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The matter was assigned to a magistrate judge (“magistrate”) for a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The magistrate concluded: (1) that plaintiff had not validly waived her right to counsel at the hearing on her application (where she…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd. And Joseph SclafaniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Patterson Ex Rel. Chaney v. ApfelDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jensen v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018
- Knudsen v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
- Lechner v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Harden v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2007
- Campbell v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.