Legal Opinion
Santana v. Zilog, Inc.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided February 23, 1995No. CIV 94-087 S MHWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAMS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this diversity action for wrongful death, alleging that chemicals used in the manufacturing process at Defendants’ computer chip facility caused Defendants’ employee, Plaintiff Jodene Santana, to miscarry on six separate occasions. Defendants have filed two motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant’s first Motion to Dismiss is on the grounds that Idaho’s wrongful death statute, Idaho Code § 5-311 does not recognize a cause of action for the wrongful death of a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crosby v. Glasscock Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Santana v. Zilog, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6610, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,831 Jodene M. Santana and Michael Santana, Wife and Husband v. Zilog, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996