Legal Opinion

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6610, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,831 Jodene M. Santana and Michael Santana, Wife and Husband v. Zilog, Inc., a California Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 4, 1996No. 95-35436Published

1Opinion of the Court

95 F.3d 780

96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6610, 96 Daily Journal

D.A.R. 10,831

Jodene M. SANTANA and Michael Santana, wife and husband,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

ZILOG, INC., a California corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-35436.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 5, 1996.

Decided Sept. 4, 1996.

David R. Lombardi, Givens, Pursley & Huntley, Boise, ID, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Stephen R. Thomas, Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett, Rock & Fields, Boise, ID, for defendant-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, Mikel H. Williams, Chief…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Parks School of Business, Inc., Dba Parks College, a New Mexico Corporation v. Fife Symington Roy A. Nicholson Sally HeinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Webster v. Reproductive Health ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. John R. Stone v. The Travelers CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Porter v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API