Crosby v. Glasscock Trucking Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice:
Appellant commenced this action for wrongful death in his capacity as personal representative of the estate of his stillborn child. The trial judge granted respondents’ motion for summary judgment on the ground a nonviable stillborn fetus cannot maintain such an action. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Kristie Crosby was twenty weeks pregnant when she was injured in a automobile accident. The car she was driving collided with a truck owned and operated by respondent Glasscock Trucking Co., Inc. It is undisputed the fetus Kristie was carrying was nonviable at the time of the accident.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Ochoa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Grier v. Amisub of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Smith v. TiffanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Willis Ex Rel. Willis v. WuSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Eades v. Palmetto Cardiovascular & Thoracic, PASupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
- Ross v. Waccamaw Community HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.