Legal Opinion

Beck v. Spindler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 20, 1959No. 37,848PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying a motion of defendant Spindler for an amendment of the judgment.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiffs against Herbert Spindler, sole trader, doing business as Herb Spindler Company, and Ventoura Corporation and stated in the verdict that plaintiffs are entitled to a rescission of the contract. The judgment was entered as a money judgment against defendants only. Spindler seeks to have the judgment amended so as to conform to the verdict, it being his contention that rescission cannot be had in this case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. I. L. Corse & Co. v. Minnesota Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Proper v. ProperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Damon v. GroteboerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  2. SCI Minnesota Funeral Services, Inc. v. Washburn-McReavy Funeral Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Miller v. SnedekerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Liebsch v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Financial Timing Publications, Inc. v. Compugraphic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API