Legal Opinion

Phillips v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 20, 2017No. 7/16PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGetty, J.

This appeal requires us to determine whether a deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) analysis conducted in accordance with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (“FBI”) Quality Assurance Standards (“QAS”) qualifies for automatic admissibility under § 10-915 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (“CJP”) of the Maryland Code, Petitioner Richmond Phillips argues that the DNA evidence is not admissible because the analysis was not performed in accordance with standards established by one of the two entities named in CJP § 10-915 (“DNA Admissibility Statute”), and because the methods of analysis…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  3. Armstead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Douglas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  5. Young v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Blackstone v. SharmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Wheeling v. Selene FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Berry & State Farm v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Nationstar Mortgage v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API