Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 28, 2020No. 9/19PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dana T. Johnson, Jr. v. State of Maryland, No. 9, September Term, 2019. Opinion by Getty, J. CRIMINAL LAW—SENTENCING—CONTROLLED DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES—VOLUME POSSESSION The Court of Appeals held that Maryland Code (“Md. Code”) (1957, 2012 Repl. Vol., 2019 Supp.), Criminal Law (“CR”) § 5-612 unambiguously provides the penalty for a violation of the same by stating the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment. Further, informed by the legislative history of Article 27, § 286 and CR § 5-612, the Court held that the maximum allowable term of imprisonment under CR § 5-612 is twenty years. Circuit…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Beckles v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Lockshin v. SemskerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Wheeling v. Selene FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Berry & State Farm v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Nationstar Mortgage v. KempCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  4. Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. United Bank v. BuckinghamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API