Legal Opinion

Crooker v. Crooker

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1954No. Docket 85; Calendar 46,209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, J.

This is a suit for an accounting and other equitable relief. Plaintiff and defendants, and, at times 2 others, had been partners in a manufacturing business. It is undisputed that until June 30, 1947, each partner worked for the partnership, drawing a $60 weekly wage, that such payments of wages were entered on the books as business expenses, and that after the deduction thereof the profits or losses were determined and apportioned among the partners in accord with their respective partnership interests. At that time dissatisfaction existed with the drawing of equal weekly wages by each of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Langdell v. LangdellMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Rinke v. RinkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Moore v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Milgrom v. Investment Management Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wentzel v. HutchisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Phares a Noel II v. Scholastic Solutions LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API