Moore v. Moore
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
Plaintiff filed a bill for divorce. Defendant countered with a cross-bill. Decree passed on the cross-bill. Defendant appeals from the division of the property. Plaintiff resides at Kalamazoo and is emplojmd at common labor most of the time. For the year preceding the hearing he earned $930 and sent about $300 of it to defendant, who lived at Constantine. The parties own a vacant lot in Fort Wayne, Indiana, worth about $500. They also own a home at Constantine; plaintiff claims it is worth $3,000; defendant claims it is worth but $2,200; it is incumbered in the sum of $1,000. The record…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Langdell v. LangdellMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Northwest Home Owners Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- De Longpre v. CarrollMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- Farah v. NickolaMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Kelley v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.