Legal Opinion

Moore v. Moore

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1925No. Docket No. 23PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff filed a bill for divorce. Defendant countered with a cross-bill. Decree passed on the cross-bill. Defendant appeals from the division of the property. Plaintiff resides at Kalamazoo and is emplojmd at common labor most of the time. For the year preceding the hearing he earned $930 and sent about $300 of it to defendant, who lived at Constantine. The parties own a vacant lot in Fort Wayne, Indiana, worth about $500. They also own a home at Constantine; plaintiff claims it is worth $3,000; defendant claims it is worth but $2,200; it is incumbered in the sum of $1,000. The record…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Langdell v. LangdellMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Northwest Home Owners Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. De Longpre v. CarrollMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Farah v. NickolaMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Kelley v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API