Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Eason

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2001No. 98-2595-CRPublishedCited by 137 opinions

1DissentN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. This case concerns a no-knock search warrant that authorized police officers to enter an apartment without knocking on the door and announcing their presence. When the police officers executed the search warrant, they found Defendant-Respondent Rayshun D. Eason (Eason) running down a hallway toward the kitchen. After apprehending him, they found a baggie of crack cocaine in the hallway through which Eason had run. The State charged Eason with possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. Eason moved to suppress the cocaine as evidence. The circuit court granted the motion to suppress and…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. State v. DuboseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. KnappWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. DearbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. People v. GoldstonMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. KramerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API