Legal Opinion

City of Tacoma v. Mary Kay, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 28, 2003No. 27332-2-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.

Mary Kay, Inc., appeals from a trial court decision that the City of Tacoma’s appeal from a hearing examiner tax assessment refund order invoked the superior court’s original jurisdiction and in allowing further pretrial discovery. Because, under these facts, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter, we reverse and dismiss.

FACTS

Mary Kay, Inc., an out-of-state corporation, manufactures and distributes wholesale skin care products and cosmetics through a network of local beauty consultants. Some of Mary Kay’s beauty consultants receive wholesale *113products and sell them as retail…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma Department of FinancingWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. AhoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. AhoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Enterprise Leasing, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Clyde HillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. New Cingular Wireless v. City Of Clyde HillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API