New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Clyde Hill
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
¶1 A complaint for declaratory judgment invokes the superior court’s trial jurisdiction, while a petition for certiorari invokes the superior court’s appellate jurisdiction. Either avenue is available as a means of contesting the legality of a municipal fine in superior court, so long as any administrative remedy is first exhausted.
*213¶2 In this appeal, the party contesting the legality of a municipal fine is appellant New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC. For years, New Cingular paid a utility tax to the city of Clyde Hill on wireless data services provided to Clyde Hill residents. New Cingular was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Shoemaker v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Dougherty v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Dougherty v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Denaxas v. Sandstone Court of Bellevue, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- James v. County of KitsapWashington Supreme Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Clyde HillWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Camille Palmer v. Rainbow Factory ShowroomsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Clyde HillWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- New Cingular Wireless v. City of Clyde HillWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Red Letter Ministries, App/cross-resp v. City Of North Bend, Resp/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015