Legal Opinion

New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Clyde Hill

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 20, 2015No. 71626-3-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 A complaint for declaratory judgment invokes the superior court’s trial jurisdiction, while a petition for certiorari invokes the superior court’s appellate jurisdiction. Either avenue is available as a means of contesting the legality of a municipal fine in superior court, so long as any administrative remedy is first exhausted.

*213¶2 In this appeal, the party contesting the legality of a municipal fine is appellant New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC. For years, New Cingular paid a utility tax to the city of Clyde Hill on wireless data services provided to Clyde Hill residents. New Cingular was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Dougherty v. DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRIESWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Dougherty v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Denaxas v. Sandstone Court of Bellevue, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. James v. County of KitsapWashington Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Clyde HillWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Camille Palmer v. Rainbow Factory ShowroomsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Clyde HillWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. New Cingular Wireless v. City of Clyde HillWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Red Letter Ministries, App/cross-resp v. City Of North Bend, Resp/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API