Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 1, 2012No. 40923-2-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, J.

f 1 Wells Fargo Bank NA appeals from the superior court’s order denying its summary judgment motion and granting summary judgment to the Washington State Department of Revenue (DOR). Wells Fargo contends that (1) RCW 82.32.060(4) required payment of interest on a refund arising from settlement of a tax dispute through a closing agreement with DOR and (2) Wells Fargo did not waive its statutory right to interest in entering the closing agreement. DOR cross appeals, contending that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under chapter 34.05 RCW, the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Evergreen Washington Healthcare Frontier, LLC v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Cashmere Valley Bank v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Chinn v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. State/wa Dept Of Transportation, Res. v. Mullen Trucking 2005 Ltd., Pets.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Barry M. & Mary Beth Gardner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.a.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API