Legal Opinion

Samaha v. Hamper Estate Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 50, Calendar No. 33,864PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

While the bill originally filed is not in the record, from a temporary injunction and an order to show cause, which do appear, it is apparent that it was filed to restrain defendant from repossessing certain premises which a judgment of restitution of a circuit court commissioner had awarded to it in a suit brought by it against plaintiff for failure to pay rent. The case was transferred to the law side of the court and a declaration was filed which bears little semblance to the one filed the day the trial started, and upon which plaintiff seeks to recover. The case went to the jury upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Security Investment Co. v. MeisterMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Blazewicz v. WeberskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. William F. Nance Realty Co. v. Wood-Wardowski Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Manuel v. Federal Commercial & Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reid v. GoodenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hotelen v. HaberlenMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Oppenheim v. National Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API