Legal Opinion

Oppenheim v. National Surety Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1934No. Docket No. 4, Calendar No. 37,468Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. Sharpe, J.

Plaintiffs owned certain real estate in Detroit and leased the same to the Hamilton Real Estate Company. When the company failed to pay its rent, the plaintiffs gave the company as well as its officers and directors notice to quit. Later, summary proceedings were brought before a circuit court commissioner against the company and against its officers and directors as individual defendants.

On the return date of the commissioner’s summons the individual defendants appeared by attorney and disclaimed any right on their part as individuals to possession of the premises. The corporation defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Samaha v. Hamper Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API