Legal Opinion

Hotelen v. Haberlen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933No. Docket No. 129, Calendar No. 37,293PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

This is an appeal in the nature of mandamus.

Defendants owned a farm and wanted to sell it. February 13, 1933, by verbal agreement, they let the farm to plaintiff to work on shares and he entered into possession. February 27, 1933, defendants sold and conveyed the farm to John Hartman without any reservation of plaintiff’s leasehold rights. March 2, 1933, defendants commenced a summary proceeding before a circuit court commissioner to dispossess plaintiff herein and have restitution of the premises. Summons was issued and served. Plaintiff herein appeared in person and by attorney and pleaded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGuffie v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Samaha v. Hamper Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meister v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  2. People v. London WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API