Legal Opinion

Solt v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1926No. 19504PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

This is an error proceeding from the order of the Public Utilities Commission, wherein, upon complaint, and after hearing, the commission revoked certificates of public convenience and necessity theretofore issued to Solt and Manning to operate motor transportation passenger busses between the cities of Cleveland and Elyria.

Under these certificates the two persons named had undertaken to and did for some period of time operate busses upon a certain schedule adopted by them, although it does not appear from the record that such schedule had been filed with the commission. The order of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matz v. J. L. Curtis Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  2. East Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Alspaugh v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Midwestern Motor Transit, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Ohio Transport, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (Robert L. Moulton, Chairman, Ralph A. Winter and Edward J. Kenealy, Commissioners)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API