Legal Opinion

Crockett v. Root

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 1943No. 30734PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiffs, the heirs of Mack Crockett, deceased, here sued to recover possession of 160 acres of land owned by Mack Crockett in his lifetime and to quiet title thereto. Defendants resisted, claiming under a deed executed by Crockett and a judgment of the district court of Marshall county in a former suit, entered after the death of Mack Crockett, adjudging the deed to be valid. Judgment was rendered for defendants on the pleadings, and plaintiffs appeal.

The allegations of plaintiffs’ pleadings, which for the purpose of this appeal must be taken as true (Roxoline Petroleum Co. v. Craig, 150…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Joyce v. McAvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. State Ex Rel. Westerheide v. ShillingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Tomlin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Grayson v. StithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Taylor v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lovell v. Western National Life Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1988
  2. Gens v. Casady SchoolSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  3. Happy Elevator No. 2 v. Osage Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Spencer v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Eaves v. BusbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API