Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Hannah

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1924No. 12948PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

The defendant in error, as plaintiff below, brought suit against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants below, to quiet title to block 11, Barrows addition to Oklahoma City. The defendants alleged that H. S. Hurst and his assigns were the owners of an undivided one-eighth interest in said property by reason of a contract dated July 27, 1909, between M. E. Hannah and Albert T. Hannah, as parties of the first part, and H. S. Hurst, as party of the second part, whereby parties of the first part agreed to convey an undivided one-eighth interest in the property in controversy to party of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stone v. CaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Clark v. DuncansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Ziska v. AveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Welch v. LaddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stolfa v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Caraway v. OverholserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. McGrath v. DurhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Phillips v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Roxoline Petroleum Co. v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API