Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Ukiah Water & Improvement Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1918No. S. F. No. 7680PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment establishing plaintiff’s water right.

The water right in question was before this court in Farmer v. Ukiah Water Company, 56 Cal. 11. Plaintiff claims as the successor to the plaintiff in that case by mesne conveyances of the land owned by Farmer, and seeks to bind the defend ant as the successor of the defendant corporation, the Ukiah Water Company. Assuming, without deciding, that the parties hereto are bound by the decree in the case of Farmer v. Ukiah Water Company, the judgment must, nevertheless, be reversed for the reason that the water right…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Mitchell v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. KerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Southern Pacific Co. v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brennan v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Great Oaks Water Co. v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist., California Court of Appeal, 6th District2015
  3. Rowland v. Kellogg Power & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Great Oaks Water Co. v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Great Oaks Water Co. v. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API