Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Kellogg Power & Water Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, C. J.

Respondent alleged that he was owner of Lot 13 in. Block 20 of the city of Wardner, “together with certain water right acquired from the Kellogg Power & Water Company, the defendant herein,” by reason of certain deeds of conveyance and adverse possession. His title to the lot was admitted, but it was denied that he was the owner of the alleged water right. After trial, the court made and entered a decree quieting title to the land and permanently restraining appellant from cutting off or interfering in any manner with respondent’s “water right and water supply.” From this decree this appeal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hildreth v. Montecito Creek Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Leavitt v. Lassen Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hudson v. Ukiah Water & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Capital Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API