Legal Opinion
State v. Moen
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 31, 2002No. 20303-4-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
38 P.3d 1049 (2002)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Peter H. MOEN, Appellant.
No. 20303-4-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Six.
January 31, 2002.
Reconsideration Denied March 18, 2002.
Paul B. Mack, Attorney at Law, Spokane, for Appellant.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, III, Deputy Prosecuting Attorneys, Spokane, for Respondent.
SCHULTHEIS, J.
The Spokane County prosecutor's office has a policy to refuse plea negotiations when compelled to disclose the identity of a confidential informant. In challenging a civil forfeiture, Peter Moen sought the name of the confidential…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Various Items of Personal Property v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hugh Wendell MacDonald v. James A. MusickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- State v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 2003